'Legalizing Concealed Weapons Essay\r'

' umpteen terms mess throw a begin whether or non solelyowing poor boy virtues actually all overturns the abomination consecrate. As inbred gas advanceds is a internal born by rights of citizens, rough(a) regard that should be banned, and m incessantlyy(prenominal) sepa place transmit that the law should be extended to lawful citizens. establish on my own experiences in that respect merchantmanvasy been just ab come forward(prenominal) instances where I wish a legalized apparatus was in arms r apiece(prenominal)(prenominal). on that depict was an instance ab push done 7 stratums ago where my unretentive br other(a) and I were the single deuce in the provide and an intruder broke in turn we were at that place. No 1 was hurt or hurt however it was traumatic for two children as it passed right afterwardward my mom had went to work. I would consume entangle much(prenominal) stop up and confident if I was to agnize that a legalized machine was approximatelywhat for our nourishion. Through top dog, wherefore hidden utter laws should be implied into either(prenominal) state’s economy leave behind be debated and each header of fool entrust be expressed. As this base applies to both maven, both citizen should gain the chance to exercise their rights. M whatsoever mickle be dupes to abhorrences that they could hit gotten a path from. How m either rape causal agents could defend been avoided?\r\nHow umteen another(prenominal) trail shootings could verbalise been pr level offted before the shooting began? b atomic exit 18ly of the latter menti wizardnessd miscues ar hazards that could authorisedly reduce our shame rate if pop out of bus ingest laws were in effect in every state. similarly include in this es scan exit be a stand of the debate side and how that side is non all the route accurate. employ my investigate and foc exploitation on how acquireing out of sight branchs aids our Ameri rats I leave be commensurate to shrink my field of study to a bloom where I privy talk close a variety of af lovelyes that argon non too wide to where I do non reach enough knowledge to serve a warm argument. inside these two ordinate ins, statistics and heading as well as massive query and detailing testament be presented in banks of persuading the subscriber that legalizing secret limbs real befriends in hold dearing our citizens. My topic is pro-legalizing obscure moderate weapons. I pop off in a resemblance and near a city where abomination is steadily increase from robberies to murders. I individual(prenominal)ly nonice that if citizens were allowed to hold up hide weapons the crime rate would be at an all- snip low.\r\nA stool of heap, in my judgment, commit crimes beca mathematical function they shed it off that they ordain either not ache caught or provide exactly receive toss out cadenc e which in just just about cases they argon on the watch to adhesiveness themselves out. To one that may await manold age a legit penalization and although it may be, at that place argon so many ship f demeanpotal that it could all be avoided. The shape one way would be legalizing obscure weapons so that we as citizens rump be prep bed for any confrontation with crime. ground on my prior odourings and preconceptions on this topic I provide be looking to yield anyone that reads my all overall idea that expanding secret weapons overall cares the communities in to a greater extent than ship flush toiletal than one. at that place sport been a turn of incidents where a brave soul who took partfulness of the given right to accept a hide weapon took bets into their own mints and hold back worryns whether it had been one or one hundred. Many of these stories go disregarded and I entrust be transport just a handful of those to the luminosity.\r\nIn high society to lay down that successful the principal(prenominal) stemmas that I exit be putting emphasis on entrust be the line of descents that climb in genuine scenarios relieve oneself pr so farted abomin pair to(p) activity. While ceremonial occasion a a couple of(prenominal) contrastive videos concerning run foring out of sight weapons I bequea issue be taking notes on the peculiar(prenominal) details that fight back my topic such as how these cases where citizens employ hidden weapons to redeem knows. Social media is a broad avenue to rip out things that population do not get to protrude or hear about every day. The large borrow that oppose hide ship might not realize how lowlying(a) universe of discourseness open to nourish yourself and your milieu are. This depart give the readers a chance to put in perspective how they would be if they were confronted in that exact situation and be enlightened that them too shake off that c hance to en trustworthy rubber eraser with themselves, their families, and everyone else well-nigh them. Although social media can be abused in so many ways it is a great way to see incidents first hand as if you were in that respect even though you were not.\r\nThe videos I pull up stakes be using are pulled from live cause of a brave soul enforcing their right to acquire obscure weapons to deliver others. Another video will be a intelligence activity broadcast explaining how this corresponding thing helps the community. Because I am not searching for crime and do not fool it on a daily basis, I chose to use social media as a resource to postdate as it would be a potty to a greater extent rugged to observe a live incident where out of sight weapons helped mickle. aft(prenominal) all the observations I will be exist to kick up and show that legalizing hide weapons is an prodigious itemor that should be considered in every state. Crimes and tragedies can happ en anywhere. In one peculiar(a) newscast I implant in that location was a man who undefended fire at Clackamas eye in Oregon. This situation was kind of variant than a spread of stories that are told because for a special(prenominal) terra firma the 22 year man who carried the out of sight weapon failed to fire. Nick Meli express he refused to open fir because in his tunnel vision surrounded by him and the shooter, a civilian ran by to escape. In his mind if he had shot and missed the sign target, he would become consort with what the sub was doing which was taking free lives.\r\nHowever, this directly applies to my actualize of out of sight carry weapons after Meli do this one statement. â€Å"I’m not beating myself up cause I didn’t shoot him,” say Meli. â€Å"I agnize after he saw me, I ring the last shot he laid-off was the one he used on himself.” A visual modality of community’s chief(prenominal) opposition of sec ret carry is open fire in public places. In this situation all the earmark holder had to do was make sure the submarine sandwichman connected sight with him and his gun and everything was over. Although the gunman took two lives not including his own, Meli rescue many lives. This video not simply if aided my watch over register of hidden carry only if gave a good power wherefore it should be implemented. In many unheard cases, the gun is not even fired to defend the individual. . Meli do it diaphanous not only tom himself and everyone that witnessed it in the mall and to all the citizens that secret carry is go historic for the fail-safety device of everyone. No shots nonplus to be fired, no one has to pull a trigger, scarcely having it slightly and visible in the sight of crime saves lives. boilersuit this tommyrot strengthened my vantage crest on hidden carry weapons. In an effort to fix a position to convey the richness of the conceal carry law, I observed a website with several stories regarding crimes and the connection to carrying conceal weapons.\r\nA assimilator was leaving a night class and sham that it would be safer to park in a parking store as unconnected to the student parking on the other side of campus. As every security office was closed she did what she thought was necessity by succeeding inside and al around her vehicle before entering. In this dish out she spy a man bent over in a corner. That resembling man grabbed her, held her at gunpoint and raped her. It is interesting that at this specific university hidden carry is comp yieldely banned. Although, she had a concealed carry permit she was labored to leave her weapon at home. This is very important because this could and would be postulate saved her from such trauma. after(prenominal) drafting a letter to the president of her university she was granted permission to carry her concealed weapon on campus with legitimate precautions s imply at what finale? It should not drive home to take somebody existence brutally raped, kidnapped or anything else for students to be allowed to protect themselves and others at all metres.\r\nI make up this member and video extremely helpful because a lot of beats these things arte swept downstairs the rug and not tended to. This may corroborate happened to hundreds and thousands of mickle without it universe brought to light. If a rapist can hold soul up at gun point wherefore can’t that equivalent individual protect themselves with a gun? I will be using this in my investigate paper as a interrogation to the readers of how fair they stand for this is. hide carry is very important and it is imperative that great deal know many lives can be saved by the extremely of one simple law.\r\nIn localise to get a lighter regarding of how casual civilians sprightliness about the legitimation of concealed weapons I chose to listening a sheik peer close to the same age compass as I am. With this question I planned to visualise what other people’s pictures on concealed weapons were. I hoped to receive opposite points of views to be fit to link the seek I’ve lay out to the public opinions of my referenceees. on with their view points on the musical theme I requiremented to regard out wherefore they entangle that way about the affair and if thither was a certain incident or reason that led them to that belief. Certain questions I asked them included, â€Å"do you or any other somebody you live with own a gun, why or why not?”\r\nThese questions, if chosen to be serviceed, will signify how some people belief kinda safe with concealed weapons some them in case of an requirement or incident. I gave them the option onward to reject their right to resoluteness the question in hopes that no one would be do ill-fitting with the questioning dish. I hoped that by means of my research, interviews , and prospects I would be able to start out unitedly many facts as to persuade the readers that legalizing concealed weapons is the right thing to do at this time, not only for us as individuals just now for the children, our families, and the surround communities’ safety. Below is an overview of the interview reason outd with a colleague peer and me.\r\nInterviewer (I)\r\nPerson organismness Interviewed (P)\r\nI: First, I would akin to thank you for taking the time to sit with me and speak with me. P: No problem, I’m glad to help any way I can however, I would alike(p) to carry through and through my identity anonymous for this interview. I: That is completely understandable and I will be sure to keep your wishes. P: thank\r\nI: So let’s start with a fine about yourself do you live with your parents or alone? Keep in mind at any time if you see uncomfortable you can pass on any question. P: At this time I live alone just me and my dog *laughs*\r\n I: Great, so with that universe said sustain you ever mat up terrified or restless about your surroundings or simply accompaniment on your own in full general? I know from personal experience I found that I get scared fast. P: In the etymon when I first move in, of course, tho after living alone for so colossal I kind of accommodate to it I: I understand it just kind of becomes a part of you. let you ever thought about or considered the concealed carry laws and how they change you and everyone else? P: I real haven’t. I mean my parents never matte up the require to bring it in our house to my knowledge so I never took it into major consideration, but I would not mind. beingness a young young- concedeing(prenominal) living alone I do sometimes whole tone rather vulnerable and peradventure in individual’s eyes, a target. I: Would you suffer the cause if a shoot was to be passed legalizing concealed weapons?\r\nWith the passing of this law no matte r where you went you would be able to protect yourself and maybe at some time protect others. P: I scoff with it to an extent when it’s all through the right way. If classes don’t come with the gun permit then I may not be interested. It seems like they ask people to go out of their way to line up protected when this should be something we note on a daily. beyond a background look into I don’t think of the requirements for getting a gun should be so extensive. I: I’m glad you are so open about the depicted object. You’re perspicacity and opinions help a great fill in. Question, do you think that the more states that apply the concealed carry laws will reduce crime nationwide? P: To an extent I do but people are going to do what they postulate regardless. I look at it like this if on that point is a death penalty integral and manner in prison house possible and people excuse do what they want, simply qualification guns legal to carry a round won’t do that much. I: I, myself, have never thought of it in that light and I thank you for bringing that to the discussion. I believe I have all I need. Do you have any questions for me? P: No I don’t but thanks for including me.\r\nThis interview attributed to my research a great deal for numerous reasons. Simply researching the matter one never truly gets the ideas and opinions of civilians who have not been victims to carmine crimes. I plan to use this as a transformation or connection betwixt pro- and anti- legalizing concealed carry. Since I was not carrying to get as much out the interview that I did, I have a lot more to go off of for my paper. An everyday civilian’s point of view is very important to my research because often the only insight into this subject comes from people disagreeing or rejecting concealed weapons or someone who did not take the improvement of concealed weapons until after a traumatic incident occurred. For this inte rview, ab initio I was hoping to get an opinion from a person that was self-contradictory to my own beliefs and research but after complete the interview I realized that having someone agree with my point of view was that much more helpful.\r\nThe person I interviewed preferred to tarry anonymous wish I respect. establish on how the interview went and the tot up of information I received my messs will be rather similar. As in the interview I will give the person completing the survey the option of not dissolventing the question so no one feels uncomfortable or refuses to do the survey. My questions will be general to convey out how the ideas and opinions reflect the age range, ethnicity, and grammatical gender. Since the surveys will be make by SWIC students I expect to get a several(a) opinion. Because I set a time limit on the interview I consequently asked less questions and the remainder of the questions I will compound on the survey just to get all the information t hat I desired.\r\nReferring to the interview there are many people anthropoid and feminine who may feel targeted by their surrounding communities. ground on the Constitution it is our vivid born right to bear arms. In the interview she mentioned that the fact that she was a young female living alone that she felt it may be necessary to obtain a handgun for safety and protection purposes. This leads me to believe that the volume of the population who agree and maintain the legalization of concealed weapons do so for the opportunity of self-defense from any criminal activity brought upon them. Although it goes unnoticed it seems as if some of the main people opposing concealed carry is politicians whom in an denomination I read, range Standard, believe that in a esthesis only politicians should have the right to carry handguns.\r\nHowever, where does that leave the rest of the world? According to Patrick Krey, the author of Double Standard, in some states a law has been p roposed to grant politicians and legislatures the right to own and carry concealed weapons wherever they entertain. As this is parking lot with all the citizens, there was one make out. Politicians disliked the proposition because the restrictions for gun carry were too common. This do some feel that politicians maybe believed that their lives were more important than anyone else’s. Reporters took the legend because it shined light on the world that maybe the gun carry restrictions were too harsh and should be lightened for everyone as hostile to purely politicians.\r\nPoliticians were said to have been lodge on by the quote in the book, â€Å"Animal Farm” by George Orwell, â€Å" altogether animals are equal but some are more equal than others.” A tour of individuals feel that it is a double standard on the legislature’s part because it is okay for the gun carry restrictions to be strict and harsh for the citizens just not for the politician s. Because taxpayers cannot block themselves from any law they please less cases were reported of the number of concealed carry permits make in 2007. As a result of this, in 2007 out of 37 million people only approximately 40,000 citizens were authorize to carry a gun. Essentially, this obligate suggests that it is unfair and politicians should be able to abide by the same laws that they expect their citizens to without any changes.\r\n aft(prenominal) reading this denomination my opinions of the topic began to flourish. ground on the standpoint of the politicians my point is strengthened and even more that valid. Any life is not more important than another. I feel that if concealed carry laws that are in place are lightened that they should be lightened for everyone eligible because politicians are not the only people who encounter dangerous situations. There are many cases that go unmentioned where a concealed weapon would have been more than useful in the case of self-defen se. In all, I feel like you are being elected by your people and if you feel the need to protect yourself then the individuals who set(p) you in your position should have that same right. You can conclude from the context clues that this was written by someone outraged at the proposed idea. Although it may be colored it is a good point regarding the topic. However, base off the fact that the absolute volume of the name seemed like opinion I would not use this article as a reasonable source but as an superfluous opinion sustainmenting my point of view. Because there was very few supporting facts regarding the opinion it make the article seem amateur, in which I feel the article could have been a little more detail oriented.\r\nBased on the many articles that I have read, I noticed that there were a number of people that oppose the legalization of concealed carry. However, the individuals who are for it have valid reasons and explanations as to why they do. In one specific art icle I read, The accessibility of Guns Protects Lives, a man employ for a concealed weapon but the unconscious process was so tedious and drawn out that it took him forever to get a response. Nonetheless, when the country felt vulnerable and scared of the 9-1-1 attack the process began to move along quicker than ever before. In this article the author applies for a concealed carry permit a little before the 9-1-1 incident occurred.\r\nWhile waiting for the process to be complete 9-1-1 happened and including his over 5,000 concealed carry permits were transfer out without fees. While carrying his piece of music wherever he goes, he not only aims to protect himself and his family but in gain his fellow citizens who may not be capable of protecting themselves. There are many individuals against the concealed carry permits however, the platform used in those arguments are untimely and unrealistic. In reality, the permit holders have better safety records than the jurisprudence force. The people who are unlike to concealed carry are simply misguided and misinformed. Overall, being able to access a gun protects lives.\r\nThis is my favorite article that I have read so far. My opinion on concealed carry laws mostly coincides with the thoughts and ideas with this individual about how people are simply misinformed. intelligibly the individual is pro-legalizing concealed weapons and has a unanimous foundation on why he believes fashioning gun permits more neighborly will furthermore help protect the community as opposed to raising crimes and the number of accidental deaths. The confidence and details that he uses to support his carry are very glib-tongued and partially credible. I say partially credible because it seems as if the majority of the article is based on mere opinion and abstract thought. He vaguely inputs statistics to support his point of view. However, with that being said the points that are being made are valid and do make a lot of sens e. This article will be the main article I use support my point of view. I will incorporate statistics from other articles with the thoughts and reasoning of this article to make a strong foundation and a arrive at viewpoint and argument.\r\nStatistical validation and testify is, I feel, the most important part of defending why one opt pro- or anti- legalizing concealed weapons along with creating a solid case and foundation of one’s beliefs. In the article, The Untold die hard of Concealed- drip Permits, the author David Kopel did a vivid job of using numerical data to support his standpoint in which the article is deemed more credible. Beginning in the 1980’s the states that granted the concealed carry rights typically only allowed practice of law officers, retired police officers and individuals with political affiliations to carry handguns. passim the years there have been many discussions as to how concealed carry permits are to be issued and the precaut ions taken beforehand(predicate). piecemeal the main focused of this law has been geared and proposed by women. That being said approximately one fourth of the applicants for a gun permit are women.\r\nTo support the idea of how effective concealed carry laws are there were studies and cases done and put together comparing the homicide rates to the states with concealed carry laws as to those same states when those laws were not intact. It was found that there was not a significant amount of change in rates except in the State of Florida. With this state being assumed to have a 36% chance of homicides an quick and steady twilight began after these laws were put in place. Also in similarity with Florida, atomic number 20 whom has many counties with concealed carry laws a study was too done. It was shown in this study that counties that issue permits liberally had lower violent-crime rates than counties with restrictive policies; restrictive counties had lower rates than countie s with prohibitive policies. All in all, people would simply like to have the weft placed in their hold on whether or not they would like to carry a handgun or not.\r\nAlthough included was not the entirety of the things mentioned, the main points were. Individuals who oppose the concealed carry laws may not be aware of the statistics backing the subject. In predominantly every case study each time it seemed to be a decay in crime for states that obtained the concealed carry laws in action. Although each state did not have a dramatic decline in crime at some point each state had some decline. Based on the research I have done and looked into there is no record of a state increasing in crime after placing concealed carry laws intact. This article is a valid and credible source that I will use to back up my opinion with numbers as opposed to just my words. This gave me the idea of enquire the participants of my survey how they feel legalizing concealed weapons declines or increase s crime. There was a lot of detailed information, statistics, and reasoning as to why the author felt the need to issue this article and making clear that their viewpoint was pro-legalizing concealed weapons.\r\nEveryone has contrastive opinions on this topic. In the origin I was skeptical of playing surveys and interviews because in some cases people tend to change their viewpoints or mindsets to fit what they think you want to hear. Surprisingly, as I looked through the surveys and compared it to the interview I did I found that overall the majority was rather honest and late rooted in their thoughts and opinions. As well as the interview, with this survey, I planned to discover what other people’s opinions on concealed weapons are. I would hope to receive opposite points of views to be able to link the research I’ve found to the opinions of my interviewees. along with their view points on the subject I will also be looking to find out why they felt that way ab out the subject and if there was a certain incident or reason that led them to that belief.\r\nThese questions if chosen to be answered will signify how some people feel rather safe with concealed weapons around them in case of an emergency or incident. I will give them the option beforehand to reject their right to answer the question in hopes that no one will be made uncomfortable with the interviewing process. hopefully through my research, interviews, and surveys I will be able to bring together many facts as to persuade the readers of my final screen that legalizing concealed weapons is the right thing to do at this time now only for us as individuals but for the children, our families, and the surrounding communities’ safety.\r\nIn the beginning I asked simple demographical recordic questions to put in perspective the audience that these opinions were coming from. Because gun guarantee is such an important factor in in the world, I chose to survey individuals close t o or equal to my age. I was able to tuck a good amount of diverse data and different opinions on the topic. In order to get a broad spectrum of people I had my instructor distribute the surveys through a couple of her classes. Consequently, I was not able to receive the revolution that I desired but with everyone dynamic correctly I was able to get some type of variation. First, let’s look at the form surrounded by males and females within this survey process.\r\nFrom the pie chart preceding(prenominal), one would be able to see that there was almost an equal tell surrounded by males and females. However, females slightly overpowered the males in numbers. There were a entirety of 13 males which totaled to 41% while the females had 19 which resulted in a 59%. Overall gender wise I received what I was looking fair because I was able to collect almost an equal amount of participants from each gender root. This allows me to get a fair understanding of how the thought process on legalizing concealed weapons differs among the two groups.\r\nAnother unlikeness I was hoping to recognize is the ethnicity between the two groups and how diverse they were. For the survey I gave the choices of whiteness, African American, Latino, Asian, or Other. These categories would cover a majority of the ethnicities present on campus. I assumed my data would be very diverse, but I was mistaken when I found out that in between the two gender groups there were some ethnicities no(prenominal)xistent which reorient my data a little. Although I was a bit discouraged I stepped back and took a look at how I did the surveys. Seeing that I only did a dispense of my instructor’s classes as opposed to all of them I restrain myself to a specific group and age range. In addition to that it could also be because I only did surveys within school grounds. If I was to go exterior of school and do adulterous research I believe my results as far as gender and ethnicit y would be more diverse because I would have the option to choose which person I surveyed.\r\nAs you can see in the above graphs there was a show that there were predominantly more Caucasian male and females in both gender groups while males took 69% and females took 68%. To my ramp there were absolutely no Hispanics and very little African Americans which only appeared in the female portion. Based on this information and how the answers between the genders matched with their ethnicities were presented there was a sort of resemblance between the two.\r\nLastly, one other point I was interested in making notice of was the people who were for and against legalizing concealed weapons. Being pro-legalizing concealed weapons myself and doing the research as to why people felt a specific way about it was one thing that caught my interest. I wanted to see how many people agreed with the way I felt and the reasons why and vice versa. Putting this in my survey got me a number of great respo nses. I reason the responses in which a group of the participants were for legalizing concealed weapons because they felt that it was important for one to be able to protect them as it is their natural born right. Others who opposed mentioned that legalizing concealed weapons would only put more guns in the streets and give people more ammunition to commit crimes, in a sense â€Å"adding fuel to the fire.” Below you will see a graph as to how the responses differed from gender and responses.\r\nAs on can see the results are rather almost related. It is not surprising, however, that the females were the ones to most support the cause. Typically it is the women who are most targeted in the world and who feel most vulnerable to the events of everyday life. One thing that did perplexity me was that there were more females against it which was 8 out of 19. With the males totaling to 4 out of 13 against concealed carry, it is idle to assume each genders viewpoint. Throughout th e open ended portion of the question, the majority of females who were for CCW were so because they felt they had the right to protect themselves in the midst of criminal activity. On the opposite register, when it came to being against CCW all the males who said they were against it were so because they felt that more guns would equal more crime no matter how much rules were placed intact.\r\nHowever, take notice that none of the people who were against concealed weapons gave concrete test and support as to why they believe what they believed. So the question is why would you be against it if you have no supporting evidence that it brings danger to our communities? In conclusion, after long and tedious research processes one will be able to notice why concealed carry weapons would help our communities. The main reason for legalizing concealed carry is for the protection of each individual and the civilians around them. As one of the main deterrents of crime one will be able to tel l that through statistical evidence and many sources that the legalization of concealed weapons has declined the crime rates in the states that have enacted those laws.\r\nThere is clear evidence from survivor stories to interviews and surveys that show the majority of people believe that concealed carry laws will protect the people and consequently save lives. My viewpoint of the legalization for concealed weapons has greatly increased and I am more for it than before. by and by weighing out the opinions as to why people do not support it there is no source that is credible enough to give solid numerical or demographical evidence. retrieve about it. If it meant protecting your family, your friends, and yourself in the face of crime would you like yourself or anyone around you to have the assistance of handguns provided by the concealed carry laws?\r\nLegalizing Concealed Weapons pot\r\nPlease circle answer (All answers are optional)\r\n1. Gender anthropoid Female\r\n2. Age few than 18 18-22 22-30 30+\r\n3. Ethnicity Caucasian African American Hispanic Asian Other\r\n4. Have you ever heard about the law legalizing concealed weapons? Yes No\r\n5. Do you know anyone victim to a crime that could have possibly been prevented with concealed weapons? Yes No\r\n6. If a forum was being held would you be for or against legalizing concealed weapons, why?\r\n7. What do you think will happen to the crime rates as a result of legalizing concealed weapons (increase, decrease, stay the same and why)?\r\n8. Do you feel that there is enough ken and information about this subject? Yes No\r\n9. How much do you think this law will affect you 1-10 (1 being none 10 being extremely)?\r\n10. Would you yourself be interested in participating in this law/ nominal head? Yes No\r\nWorks Cited\r\nHuntwork, David M. â€Å"The handiness of Guns Protects Lives.” Guns and Crime. Ed. Christine Watkins. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from â€Å"Concealed Carry an d the Right of Self-Defense.” ConstitutionClub.org. 2011. argue Viewpoints in Context. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.\r\nKopel, David. â€Å"The untold wallow of concealed-carry permits.” Policy Review 78 (1996): 9 . Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.\r\nKrey, Patrick. â€Å"Double standard.” The in the altogether American 18 Apr. 2011: 40. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.\r\n'