Comparing A Midsummers Nights Dream, King Richard II, and King Lear :: comparison compare contrast essays

Relation between Nature and Man in A Midsummers Nights Dream, King Richard II, and King Lear A Midsummers Nights Dream, King Richard II, and King Lear both represent different philosophies people hold regarding the phenomenon of their lives. The relationships between human races and foreign forces differ between the plays too. A Midsummers Nights Dream emphasizes records part in human breeding. It is seen as the driving force for everything good and bad. Divine decree is the focus in King Richard II. The characters all seem to have a normal acceptance of outcomes as what the gods wanted. Lastly, King Lear has man viewing nature as destructive and angry. He wants to control natures fury and decide for himself what should be pleasant and legitimate. While none of these philosophies can be labeled as defame or right, each does have valid support within the given play. The first play, A Midsummers Nights Dream has a lot of nature metaphor is in families. The very first con versation in it has a king blaming the moon and night time for his not being equal to marry. Theseus wanted to marry Hippolita right away but four moonshines were delaying him. another(prenominal) example comes from Lysander. He saw roses in Hermias cheeks and rain falling from her disturbed eyes. When Lysander wakes up and sees Helena, He decides he wants her instead of Hermia. He says, things growing ar not ripe until their season . . . which leads me to your eyes (MND II, 2,100-110). He compares himself to unripe take or something that has not reached its final or mature stage in growth. Lysander said that he only fancied Hermia because he was young and nave but now that he was ripe, he wanted Helena. This is a parallel made by Lysander to nature. Not only did he cogitate that nature controlled all actions but he truly believed everything followed the same life pattern. Later, Lysander is confronted by Hermia and he compares her to terrible things like animals and serpents because he no long-lived saw her as his love but as someone he outgrew. This reference shows a part of life that is not wonderful and moderately but loathsome and dirty. Nature is obviously a very king-sized part in the play too because of the continual reference and close to constant presence of the fairy King Oberon and his Queen Titania.